Thanks, Luis Miguel. The new article
 |
| closed mouth no flies. (*) |
For starters, I confess that I am bored Luismi . During the time that we fight for the granting of new licenses it seemed useful and very necessary to point out every one of his blunders. That led me to write more than 100 articles on this blog. His intellectual incoherence and inconsistency me made it easy. Proof of this is that our objectives were largely, but compliments. Now we only need to put the icing on the cake. That makes you so afraid that Luismi see with their eyes. That it takes to deal with every day that does not come true and that when he signed the agreement with the City is the promised very happy to sell to the fanatical minority that maintains that everything was tied up and securely fastened. It seems that he has come a wave of where will the decision on the new regulation, together with the fee referred to and not know how to build a costume that will hide your most embarrassing failure : His betrayal of an entire assembly to get zilch excepting the applause of those who are now licensed.
Again, Luismi bores me. From the union perspective I found the best partner we could have. In that sense has not changed my opinion of him. I am convinced that another president in the APATZ, with a minimum of lights and the support he had, we would have put more than difficult to get half of what we achieved.
Despite the boredom that leads me I echo the requests of some colleagues to discuss certain details of the latest issue of the journal Zarataxi (No. 42, June 2010) particularly its editorial and the article refers to the candidate meeting with Rudi. To do this go.
Regarding the editorial
is difficult to understand how the president of the APATZ, without the slightest embarrassment, uses money from members to manipulate reality, to try to cover up fiasco that, in essence, has made its management. If he is to blame others, do not hurt garments. It is usual technique.
I quote from the editorial: "the most important is the concern of many partners due to the selfish attitude of some colleagues who have doubled the car without being sick, or have 55 years. (...) This was designed for members who have serious illness or infirmity by age, not to allow a normal working day and to ensure their livelihood, they could hire someone to make use of your license (..) Out this, we are faced with unsupportive attitudes and anticompañerismo "
filed
And it is so hot dog. I guess believe that taxi drivers in Zaragoza memory falters them to the same extent that he shame. I guess Luismi think that no one remembers that the old regulation prevented the recruitment of employees except for cases of absence or sick leave. I guess Luismi will hope that everyone has forgotten that it was he who signed the death of the old regulation and that he did betray the sovereign will of an entire guild Assembly. I guess Luismi want to hide that because of this betrayal and the signing of agreement today we have 53 cars bent.
later Leo: "Finally, we have invited the unions to develop a provincial agreement (...) We will taxi on the way to dignify the figure of the employee"
What a shame. I still remember how feather in the signing of the current National Convention Taxi forgetting that UGT was one of the signatories. What happens now? Is not it good to the convention? Want to change it because you realize the goal that put him? UGT that does not have to carry out their plans. Luismi concerned about the dignity of employees as well as to me your personal or professional future: A fig. To Luismi the employee is someone who already cause lesser entitlement spending as the canon. And now it gives them a defender of their dignity. On this particular thing I have to say at the negotiating table called for the provincial agreement because that agreement is dead without signature the only union in Aragon has a membership level sufficient to constitute a section of the taxi union. A section of which I am responsible.
Regarding the meeting with Luisa F.
Rudi quote: "The Association asked the candidate that would take effect if the motto that the same PP won the Taxi Ordinance 1999, 'a car a driver'. "
Association guess would clear Rudy was its president, Luis M. Segura Torres, who signed the death of the Ordinance of 1999 and thus the principle of "one taxi driver." The same is now asked its reestablishment. I hope that the candidate has knowledge of the absolute lack of coherence of the former candidate for the PAR to the city of Zaragoza. Later
reads:
"Rudi was exposed him to the unlikely event that the judges determine to accept the challenge to the Regulation of 2007 (the judges accepted the challenge and, smarty, another thing is the fault of the sentence) , especially with regard to economic canon, and asked about the position could have a Hall of PP, Rudi states that an injunction is to be fulfilled, it would return the money at issue and withdraw licenses also not be awarded in accordance with law. "
There you have it. Pure contradiction. Responsible for safeguarding the interests of taxi drivers who have committed to taxi drivers who suffer the worst damage: The withdrawal of their licenses. That's Luis Miguel Torres Segura, best known for Luismi I APATZ, the Betrayer of Assemblies.
Suppose we are given what is given Luismi fears. A ruling that is inconsistent with current law and regulation fee (?) He sees. Well as you advance Luis Miguel, defender of the employee, which will return the money but not revoke the licenses because they were accompanied by a study which guaranteed the validity of its issuance. The decision to expand the number of licenses was not contrary to law.
With all my boredom, thanks for your help. At the time was essential to achieve our goals. And the best part is that you helped us looking quite the opposite.
The licenses were granted in accordance with the law still in force except in regard to age, the self-employed contributors and the application of canon.
That's the icing that you see soon on the cake, although not prove, to thee indigestion as big as your incompetence. * The photo illustrating this article comes from the online edition of the journal Zarataxi ( http://www.zarataxi.com/revistas/Zarataxi42.pdf ) and is deleted in its ; responsible reliably express their disagreement with the use of it is done in this blog.
This leads même turning for all these weeks bloggoesfera, darling, Be Literature would not be less, not going to let the opportunity pass. I nominated Miryam_Black and here I come I with my respuestitas. 
